Google's school AI opt-out comes with a catch
Google will switch off its AI tools for K–12 accounts by default early next year, leaving it to administrators to turn them back on. But here’s the catch: schools that block AI entirely also lose student access to Google Search, because its AI features can’t be disabled separately.
The move follows worries about cheating and students’ well-being, plus pressure from lawmakers. Google’s also pushing Guided Learning, which coaches students through problems step by step. The company is piloting the tool in Search at select U.S. schools; it’s already in Classroom globally.
An opt-out that costs you Search isn’t much of an opt-out.
More coverage:
An MBA taught by AI avatars
San Francisco Bay University is using AI avatars to deliver lectures in its new online MBA Pro+ program, with a chatbot tutor named Bayley on hand for guidance. The degree costs $10,000, targets working and nontraditional students, and has 27 enrollees so far. Human faculty still hold virtual office hours and help shape the course materials.
It’s part of a bigger bet. SFBU rebuilt itself around AI after enrollment dropped to 30 students in 2023 — it’s now around 400. The school says AI extends faculty support and makes courses more flexible. The avatars, though, raise a fair question: what does an instructor’s job look like next?
The $1.5 million AI engineer
Companies are hiring forward-deployed engineers (FDEs) to build AI in-house and get projects out of pilot purgatory, putting them in direct competition with tech firms and consultancies. The elite ones earn $586,000 to $1.45 million a year, according to a six-month study by executive search firm Christian & Timbers. Of the roughly 17,000 FDEs in the U.S., only about 2,000 make the elite cut — and around 80% of those are current or former Palantir engineers.
Target, Barclays, Bausch + Lomb and American Express have all posted FDE roles. With executives under pressure to show real returns on AI, one recruiter expects demand to stay hot through at least 2028.
Turns out the hardest part of AI isn’t the model. It’s the plumbing.
Quote of the Day
We don’t want to ship AI for AI’s sake. When we’re doing it right, people won’t have to think about whether it was AI that made this happen or more traditional software. What matters is, did we build something that they really love?
Apple CEO John Ternus, TechCrunch
Other Links
- NY Times: OpenAI and Anthropic Set Up ‘War Rooms’ to Fight Disinfo About Midterm Elections
- Nikkei Asia: US tech giants' hidden AI debt swells 90% to $3.2tn in 6 months
- WSJ: Silicon Valley Promises AI Will Cure Disease. Drugmaker CEOs Aren’t Buying It.
- WSJ: Super Micro Computer Revenue Beats Estimates as AI Spending Surges
- WSJ: AMD Beats Wall Street Expectations as it Pivots to Data-Center First Status
- WSJ: Google Gemini and Other AI Chatbots Risk Breaching EU Copyright, Says Court Adviser
- TechCrunch: CrowdStrike to shell out nearly $500M for 2 AI security startups as the market for securing agents takes off
- TechCrunch: Anthropic is still grappling with the economics of compute
- WSJ: AI Faces the Electorate in a Multi-Front Midterm Clash
- TechSpot: Anthropic's IPO filing reveals $1.7 billion quarterly personnel bill, averaging $107,000 per employee monthly