<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Andrew Maddox &#124; Chasing the Wind &#187; Observations</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/category/observations/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com</link>
	<description>thoughts, musings, and writings of Andrew Maddox</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 01 Jan 2012 16:02:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Choke</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2011/10/choke/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2011/10/choke/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2011 21:28:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Life and Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewmaddox.com/?p=586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[At dinner in the not-too-distant past, Abby grabbed a piece of banana and shoved it in her mouth. Normally one to bite off a piece at a time, she decided that she wanted it all. She wanted a bite that &#8230; <a href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2011/10/choke/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-medium wp-image-600 alignright" title="Choking ahogo" src="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/10/Choking-ahogo-460x710.jpg" alt="" width="276" height="426" />At dinner in the not-too-distant past, Abby grabbed a piece of banana and shoved it in her mouth. Normally one to bite off a piece at a time, she decided that she wanted it all. She wanted a bite that mommy or daddy would take.</p>
<p>Shocked to discover that her mouth was now uncomfortably full, she chewed in vain, but it was no use. She choked. Mommy and daddy came to the rescue and extricated the banana from her mouth. To prevent a repeat occurrence, mommy sliced smaller pieces for her. She pushed them away. She had her fill.</p>
<p>Choking changes future behavior.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s the fourth quarter, and the Cowboys are poised to take a seemingly insurmountable lead. On the verge of a touchdown, the ball pops from quarterback Tony Romo&#8217;s hands. No score. The Cowboys make countless mistakes in the final 10 minutes. They lose by three.</p>
<p>Mistakes lead to more mistakes.</p>
<p>Travel to Flushing Meadows for the 2011 U.S. Open Men&#8217;s Semifinals. Roger Federer has taken a commanding two sets to zero lead over Novak Djokovic. One more set to win. Federer crumbles as Djokovic mounts an unrelenting comeback. Crushing victories followed in sets three and four. The final set appears to be headed for extra games, but Federer errs at the end, losing the final set 5-7.</p>
<p>Easing up before the finish opens doors for opponents.</p>
<p>In what many believe will be the last NBA finals for several years, the Miami Heat take a double digit lead into the final minutes of the game. The players jump and scream on the court, celebrating their near-certain victory. Stunningly, this display lights a fire in the Mavericks who reel off an impressive 22-5 run to steal the victory.</p>
<p>Celebrating victory prematurely is foolish.</p>
<p>America&#8217;s past-time, 2011. The historically inept Rangers are poised to take their first world series crown over the Cardinals. Two outs, two strikes. One more pitch and a victory for the nine fielders. Unless, of course, that pitch leads to a run. Hours later, players wonder how they let that game get away.</p>
<p>Intense pressure distorts execution.</p>
<p>Choking is a reflexive behavior. Abby choked because she tried to eat too much at once. The Cowboys choked because they feared making more mistakes would cost them the game. Roger Federer choked when he let up before finishing the match. The Heat choked after celebrating their victory instead of finishing the game. The Rangers choked because they let the pressure get to them.</p>
<p>In Abby&#8217;s case, well, she&#8217;s only one and gets a free pass for choking. For the rest of the evening, she was banana-averse&#8211;and for good reason, in her mind it was a dangerous behavior not worth trying again. As a one-year-old, she&#8217;s well suited for failure. She quickly forgets and tries again. The next morning, she returned to her normal, banana-loving self. Of course, mommy, daddy, and Abby are all more mindful to prevent this from happening again.</p>
<p>Well-paid athletes don&#8217;t get the same luxuries as small children. They are expected to perform under pressure and forget what happened in the past. The Cowboys have been dogged by their mental demons all year. Federer has been in steady decline after losing the edge to Nadal and Djokovic. The Heat came back, won game 3, but then lost the following three to cede the championship to the Mavericks. And so the question is: what will become of the Rangers?</p>
<p>Smart people choke from time to time. It&#8217;s inevitable. The foolish ones don&#8217;t learn from the past and relive it time and time again. The smart ones learn from the past and change their actions.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s to the chokers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2011/10/choke/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Oprah&#8217;s Retirement: Media Great or Narcissist?</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2011/05/oprahs-retirement-media-great-or-narcissist/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2011/05/oprahs-retirement-media-great-or-narcissist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 19:32:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewmaddox.com/?p=548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In honor of Oprah&#8216;s retirement from her tv show, a collage of her personal magazine covers. Kari recently pointed out that every magazine featured her on the cover. This, to me, seems bizarre. It&#8217;s almost like a printed shrine to &#8230; <a href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2011/05/oprahs-retirement-media-great-or-narcissist/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In honor of <a title="Oprah Winfrey" href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oprah_Winfrey" target="_blank">Oprah</a>&#8216;s retirement from her tv show, a collage of her <em>personal </em>magazine covers.</p>
<div id="attachment_556" class="wp-caption alignnone" style="width: 470px"><a href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Oprah_Collage1.jpg"><img class="size-medium wp-image-556" title="Oprah_Collage" src="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/Oprah_Collage1-460x701.jpg" alt="" width="460" height="701" /></a><p class="wp-caption-text">Click image for larger version.</p></div>
<p>Kari recently pointed out that <strong>every</strong> magazine featured her on the cover. This, to me, seems bizarre. It&#8217;s almost like a printed shrine to her greatness.</p>
<p>What do you think? Is this a good use of the <em>Oprah</em> brand or is this a little narcissistic?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2011/05/oprahs-retirement-media-great-or-narcissist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Islam, Christianity, and Burned Books</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2010/09/islam-christianity-and-burned-books/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2010/09/islam-christianity-and-burned-books/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Sep 2010 13:58:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewmaddox.com/?p=447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As I read the overly dramatic tales of a lone pastor in Florida lead his church to burn a stack of Qur&#8217;an&#8217;s, I thought, who cares? People do crazy stuff without it captivating a nation. Not surprisingly, the news that &#8230; <a href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2010/09/islam-christianity-and-burned-books/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I read the overly dramatic tales of a lone pastor in Florida lead his church to burn a stack of Qur&#8217;an&#8217;s, I thought, <em>who cares</em>? People do crazy stuff without it captivating a nation. Not surprisingly, the <em>news</em> that provides advertising revenue is what we see and read. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/10/us/10media.html" target="_blank">Source</a>]</p>
<p>The importance of one church in one state burning a stack of Qur&#8217;an&#8217;s is trivial, unless, it relates to a bigger trend. Perhaps that is the underlying assumption of this entire story: Americans have repressed hatred toward Islam, and this is the first of many outbreaks of anti-Islamic sentiment. I doubt it.</p>
<p>To the church in Florida, Dove World Outreach Center: do you think burning a stack of books is helpful? I can assure that printing presses will churn out more books than you can possibly burn. From a functional perspective, you will not win the war. Politically, you sparked a firestorm and brought media attention to your church, but what did you do with it? For an organization that focuses on outreach, how can this be helpful? (<em>Editor&#8217;s note: how ironic that the church is named after a symbol of peace, the dove.</em>)</p>
<p>I doubt that burning Qur&#8217;an&#8217;s will bring people closer to Jesus.</p>
<p>To the media: Why was this such a <em>big</em> story? And where were the editorials decrying the striking lack of fairness? In America, a group <em>threatens</em> to burn the Qur&#8217;an. In response, Afghans protested and burned U.S. flags. [<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/09/11/world/asia/11afghan.html" target="_blank">Source 1</a>, <a href="http://abcnews.go.com/WN/Afghanistan/burn-quran-day-sparks-protests-afghanistan-petraeus-endanger/story?id=11569820" target="_blank">Source 2</a>] They rioted. They <em>burned</em> U.S. flags. The irony here is that their actions were much more severe, but the U.S. ignored it. Applying their standards in return, the U.S. military would have weeded out the protesters for burning the flag. But we didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>What alarms me the most is that I never read this point. America is great because you can burn books. You can protest and vote. You can say outlandish things. Our freedom of speech is great and something absent in the Islamic world. Say what you will, but our political system is better, even if crazy people get more media coverage than they deserve.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2010/09/islam-christianity-and-burned-books/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What Would Jesus Say about Haiti?</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2010/01/what-would-jesus-say-about-haiti/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2010/01/what-would-jesus-say-about-haiti/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 13:53:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Religion]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.andrewmaddox.com/?p=417</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you think he would say? Would he blame global warming like Danny Glover? Would he cite a &#8220;pact with the devil&#8221; as the spiritual cause? Would Jesus ask for global support and donations? Or would he laud us &#8230; <a href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2010/01/what-would-jesus-say-about-haiti/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you think he would say? Would he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=a2ft5JkNWJA">blame global warming like Danny Glover</a>? Would he <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f5TE99sAbwM">cite a &#8220;pact with the devil&#8221; as the spiritual cause</a>? Would Jesus ask for global support and donations? Or would he laud us for our relief efforts?</p>
<p>I think He might chastise us for neglecting our neighbors&#8217; poverty until this cataclysmic event.</p>
<p>People in Haiti already led short, painful, and poor lives. The <a href="https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/ha.html">CIA reported</a> the average Haitian life span barely breached 60 years. The populace lives on an less than $4 a day. Most shockingly, the report indicated:</p>
<blockquote><p>estimates for this country explicitly take into account the effects of excess mortality due to AIDS; this can result in lower life expectancy, higher infant mortality, higher death rates, lower population growth rates, and changes in the distribution of population by age and sex than would otherwise be expected.</p></blockquote>
<p>Like <a href="http://fm.thevillagechurch.net/blog/pastors/?p=363">Matt Chandler said</a> before his recent brain surgery, we all die sooner or later. Sickness or catastrophe do not change the inevitable. Undeniably, the suffering in Haiti is acute today. People are hurting. People have died. But the reality is that people there already suffered and died, we just slept more peacefully at night because we did not see their pain.</p>
<p>We are right to help Haiti through their pain. We were wrong to neglect them for so long, and I think that&#8217;s what Jesus would tell us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2010/01/what-would-jesus-say-about-haiti/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>I&#8217;m Just Sayin&#8217;, That&#8217;s All</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2008/01/im-just-sayin-thats-all/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2008/01/im-just-sayin-thats-all/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 23:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmaddox.com/blog/?p=353</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Have you ever caught yourself saying, &#8220;I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;, that&#8217;s all?&#8221; Consider why these words are uttered. Usually it follows a tense verbal showdown. Person X says, &#8220;I don&#8217;t like &#8216;A&#8217;.&#8221; And Person Y is offended. In return, Person X &#8230; <a href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2008/01/im-just-sayin-thats-all/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you ever caught yourself saying, &#8220;I&#8217;m just sayin&#8217;, that&#8217;s all?&#8221;<br />
Consider why these words are uttered. Usually it follows a tense verbal showdown. Person X says, &#8220;I don&#8217;t like &#8216;A&#8217;.&#8221; And Person Y is offended. In return, Person X says, &#8220;I&#8217;m <strong>JUST</strong> sayin&#8217;, that&#8217;s all&#8230;&#8221;<br />
It seems like that phrase is the verbal get-out-of-jail-free card. You emphasize the &#8220;just,&#8221; making sure the other person knows that you had no ulterior motives. You simply said what you said, right?<br />
I don&#8217;t think it works that way, most of the time. The phrase seems to give us a license to stay mean things. But mainly it gives us a chance to cover our tails when we say unhelpful or unnecessary things. And rarely does it actually allay anger.<br />
In the future, when you begin to spew &#8220;just sayin,&#8217;&#8221; consider, &#8220;Should I be saying this at all?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2008/01/im-just-sayin-thats-all/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Something Is Wrong Here</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/12/something-is-wrong-here/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/12/something-is-wrong-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2007 04:53:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmaddox.com/blog/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Somehow I think an editor messed up on this title:]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somehow I think an editor messed up on this title:<br />
<img alt="magnacarter.png" src="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/archives/magnacarter.png" width="600" height="338" /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/12/something-is-wrong-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hate Crimes</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/11/hate-crimes/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/11/hate-crimes/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 18:56:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmaddox.com/blog/?p=349</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Protesters demand U.S. get tough on hate crimes [from CNN] Wouldn&#8217;t you say that all crimes are &#8216;hateful?&#8217; So why add a distinction of crimes that is already implied by the word? It seems worthless to me. Editor&#8217;s Note: I &#8230; <a href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/11/hate-crimes/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.cnn.com/2007/POLITICS/11/16/justice.rally/index.html" rel="external"> Protesters demand U.S. get tough on hate crimes</a> [from CNN]<br />
Wouldn&#8217;t you say that all crimes are &#8216;hateful?&#8217; So why add a distinction of crimes that is already implied by the word? It seems worthless to me.<br />
Editor&#8217;s Note: I do think ALL crimes should be punished, regardless of who is the perpetrator and who is the victim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/11/hate-crimes/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Audio Levels</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/11/audio-levels/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/11/audio-levels/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 01:15:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmaddox.com/blog/?p=348</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here&#8217;s a dead giveaway for finding a preacher by looking at the audio levels: Interesting, huh?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a dead giveaway for finding a preacher by looking at the audio levels:<br />
<img alt="audio.png" src="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/archives/audio.png" width="598" height="210" /><br />
Interesting, huh?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/11/audio-levels/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Katrina and the Fires of 2007</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/10/katrina-and-the-fires-of-2007/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/10/katrina-and-the-fires-of-2007/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Nov 2007 04:55:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmaddox.com/blog/?p=347</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Here are some things I wonder about: 1) Why did the evacuations for the fires go so much more smoothly than for Katrina? More people were forced to evacuate this time. 2) Why did the government respond more effectively this &#8230; <a href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/10/katrina-and-the-fires-of-2007/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are some things I wonder about:<br />
1) Why did the evacuations for the fires go so much more smoothly than for Katrina? More people were forced to evacuate this time.<br />
2) Why did the government respond more effectively this time? Was it learning from the mistakes of the past, or was it more effective leadership in CA than in LA?<br />
3) How much of the local culture shapes the evacuation process? This is a very sensitive question, so I&#8217;ll leave it at that.<br />
4) How many stupid things do our national leaders get to say? Harry Reid proposed, &#8220;One reason why we have the fires in California is global warming&#8221; [< a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/10/28/EDN9SVJB9.DTL">Source</a>] [<a href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,305557,00.html">Rebut</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/10/katrina-and-the-fires-of-2007/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Singular God, Plural Religions</title>
		<link>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/10/singular-god-plural-religions/</link>
		<comments>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/10/singular-god-plural-religions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 05:16:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Observations]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://andrewmaddox.com/blog/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From President Bush [Link] &#8211; [Via] (emphasis added): Q But I want to tell you &#8212; and I hope this doesn&#8217;t bother you at all &#8212; that in the Islamic world they think that President Bush is an enemy of &#8230; <a href="http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/10/singular-god-plural-religions/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From President Bush [<a href="http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2007/10/20071005-5.html">Link</a>] &#8211; [<a href="http://www.worldnetdaily.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=58026">Via</a>] (<em>emphasis added</em>):</p>
<blockquote><p>Q But I want to tell you &#8212; and I hope this doesn&#8217;t bother you at all &#8212; that in the Islamic world they think that President Bush is an enemy of Islam &#8211;<br />
THE PRESIDENT: Sure.<br />
Q &#8212; that he wants to destroy their religion, what they believe in. Is that in any way true, Mr. President?<br />
THE PRESIDENT: No, it&#8217;s not. I&#8217;ve heard that, and it just shows [sic] to show a couple of things: One, that the radicals have done a good job of propagandizing. In other words, they&#8217;ve spread the word that this really isn&#8217;t peaceful people versus radical people or terrorists, this is really about the America not liking Islam.<br />
<strong>Well, first of all, I believe in an almighty God, and I believe that all the world, whether they be Muslim, Christian, or any other religion, prays to the same God. </strong>That&#8217;s what I believe. I believe that Islam is a great religion that preaches peace. And I believe people who murder the innocent to achieve political objectives aren&#8217;t religious people, whether they be a Christian who does that &#8212; we had a person blow up our &#8212; blow up a federal building in Oklahoma City who professed to be a Christian, but that&#8217;s not a Christian act to kill innocent people. </p></blockquote>
<p>Humm&#8230; Maybe you&#8217;ve read a different Bible than I have&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.andrewmaddox.com/2007/10/singular-god-plural-religions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

